Author: ABBdriveX

AQ: What is the Reactive Power?

For a “physical” interpretation, reactive current (power/KVA flow), in my opinion is best looked at from the perspective of a generator connected directly to an infinite bus (in LV generators this is the norm).

The generator when connected to the system, “see’s/feels” the parallel impedance combination of all other generators (circa 3 ohms each) with respect to ground – which basically parallel to equate to a zero impedance in terms of restriction to any current flow out of our generator.

Post initial synchronization, the system voltage prevents currents from flowing into or out of the generator due to pressure (voltage) balance of our generator matching that of the system voltage.

If you (as the generator operator), try to lift the generator voltage, the result will only be heaps of current output flowing into the system – but with no actual extra power generated!

This is due to the fact that to achieve the extra generator voltage setpoint you desired, the generator must send out enough current into the system impedance to create the back emf required to achieve the new desired generator terminal voltage setpoint.

But because the system impedance to ground is very low (as it actually is) – then despite the extra current sent out in that fruitless attempt, the generator is near impotent to make any substantial effect on raising the “system” voltage – “fruitless” current sent out.

In a DC sense you can equate this to a small DC generator trying to lift the voltage of a load system that has a zener diode installed across that system load.

Back to the AC world, ….that current sent out in the fruitless attempt to lift system voltage must flow through the parallel low impedance of the other connected generators (each of those working against you – lowering their own generator excitation, hell bent on keeping their own same old voltage set points), thwarting our futile attempt to achieve a raise in the system voltage.

All those generators, although collectively of low impedance, compose virtually no resistance, compared to their inductive reactance. Hence all our little generators current flow – in its futile attempt to lift system volts – is virtually purely inductive.

So we have heaps of current flowing out in our attempt to lift generator volts, but because the current is 90 degrees lagging the voltage, the only power imposed on the generator prime mover is that due to the resistance of the generator windings (circa 1% of the full load current rating – hence basically un-noticeable).

Hence the physical interpretation of VAR’s, is actually simply a look at the voltage balance perspective of an electricity network. It’s the collective attempt of many parallel-connected generators to influence the system voltage – either trying to raise the voltage at a particular node (positive VAR’s) or trying to reduce the voltage at a particular node (negative VAR’s flowing back through our generator due to our attempt to lower our generator setpoint – which “lets current in”).

Reactive Power is an electrical parameter that exist in a sinusoidal (AC circuits). It maybe zero or a certain magnitude. It maybe capacitive in nature or it maybe inductive nature. In the power triangle, it is the vertical power component (plus or minus / capacitive or reactive). It may be supplied from power sending end (grid or generator) on from the power receiving end (load). A capacitor bank connected on the grid provides capacitive reactive power. An inductor bank connected on the grid provides inductive reactive power. Both of them have magnitude. Reactive power also influences the between phase angle displacement between the voltage and the current. It is power but reactive power.

AQ: Hysteresis and eddy currents

Hysteresis would also lead to harmonics, complicating things even further. And, when considering unbalanced three-phase systems and/or the presence of harmonics, the conventional tools for power system analysis might not be applicable.

The losses due to hysteresis are limited by using better materials in transformer core. Eddy current losses are limited by using laminated construction. These losses are a relatively small portion of the total losses in a power system. Most of the losses are Joule losses (currents and resistances).

Because “energy” might be misinterpreted. Sure, But they do so twice (one positive, one negative) on every cycle of the AC system, so the average energy is zero.
There is an energy “exchange” between magnetic and electric fields. But no, that is not an oscillation in energy (kWh), not something that you could measure, for instance, in the torques on a mechanical shaft (that is purely kW, active power).

AQ: Transformer tap changer

Q:
We are frequently changing tap position of Unit station transformer due to voltage problem. What are the impacts on transformer life and is there any solution to minimize this?

A:
Having more tap changing per week is not bad, but it wears out the tap changer faster and does require more maintenance. We set our bandwidth at 1.5 volts, 0.75 up and 0.75 down, with a minimum timer of 30 seconds (voltage has to be out of bandwidth for more than 30 seconds for tap changer to move). Voltage for the OLTC controller is based on a 120V base. This normally worked well for our city loads, but perhaps your loads vary even more. I have used a bandwidth of 2 volts maximum with good success to keep the OLTC from tapping more than I liked (250 taps per week, and naturally if your loads swing more than what we had then your taps per week are going to be higher). The 250 count per week maximum is just a goal we set to try and maximize the life of our tap changers and minimize our maintenance. Looking at your timer and bandwidth may help reduce the taps per week. When the tap count per week jumps up suddenly you can suspect the controller might be bad. One more thing, I never use the X setting, just the R. I would draw the voltage “curve” versus the current and figure out my maximum voltage based on the maximum current. This worked well for me for my 23 years of utility work (again, these are city loads, base power factor during the summer was 85%). The power factor would be higher in the winter and lower in the summer (summer at 85% and winter was over 95% because in the winter we had no air conditioning loads). That is why I did not use the X setting (one setting year round).

Since it appears that you are talking about OLTC, then 250 taps per week is the maximum level that is reasonable in my opinion for a transformer serving varying loads, such as a city. I worked for electric utilities in the US for 23 years and looked at load tap changing counts every week for over 450 MW of transformers (15 MVA to 46 MVA all serving city loads). This count is the top end we would allow. The average count was in the 125-150 range per week (summer loads, with wide varying loads each day, winter loads caused less tapping per week). Oil does not degrade rapidly in the OLTC (that is operating properly) even with a maximum of 250 counts per week, but we would take oil samples every year of the OLTC and the transformer to keep tabs on their overall health. If the oil in the OLTC does degrade rapidly, then there is a good chance that the alignment of the taps is improper and arcing may be occurring during the tap changing.

OLTC has little or no effect on the life of the transformer. Also, there are two separate oil compartments, one for the OLTC and one for the transformer.

AQ: Motor power cable – bigger or smaller?

When a choosing a power cable for a motor, we prefer using one larger diameter cable than two smaller diameter cables in parallel, although it would cost less to do so. Why?

1. Conductors/Cables/Feeders in parallel connection generally are not recommended unless there is no option, therefore it can be adopted under the following conditions:
i. Cables are of the same material and cross section area.
ii. Are of the same route and length.
iii. The sum of the current carring capacity of the parallel circuits after applying all necessary applicable correction factors should be greater than the nominal regulated current of the protective device.
iv. The current carrying capacity (before derating) shall be not less than 300A (according to the local authority/Service provider requirement/regulation).
v. Capability of addressing the Thermal & electrodynamics constraints in proper way.

2. Some designs call for parallel connection so as to:
i. Overcome the voltage drop.
ii. Avoid the difficulties of installing big size cables (bending, pulling) due corridor limitation,etc.
iii. Meet the Power demand.
iv. Mitigate the cost (Costwise).

3. For electrical Motors, two connections are normally required. One from MDB to Motor CP and other from CP to the Motor.
By virtue of the requirement of Delta/star starter, two cables are required (Mandatory) between CP & motor (one will be dead just after changing to delta connection).
While the connection from the MDB to CP will be one, sized according to the Motor rating.

However, Parallel connection of Feeders need an expert engineer(s) to meet the requirement since Short Circuit fault protection for parallel circuits require further evaluation from the Engineer that the impact of the short circuit current within the parallel section will have severe fault due to fault current path that can occur in addition subtransient contribution of the downstream system.

AQ: “Hissing sound” in SF 6 Gas insulated HV Switch Gear

This could be internal corona discharge. The switchgear should be de-energized and closely examined. That means pump out the SF6 and take it apart. Examine all insulating components.

Especially if the sound can be localized to portions of the switchgear which do not have bushings for connection to overhead lines. Even if the sound is in the area of air bushings, deenergizing will allow more in-depth inspection and addressing any sharp edges or cracked insulators, etc.

Take this pieces of equipment out of service immediately, perform a “hi-pot” or high potential test on the various elements of the switchgear and attempt to locate the area that is “leaking” to ground (or between phases). Inspect closely for indications of tracking on insulators from corona discharge and replace any compromised components. After component replacement, installation of new SF6 gas and other repairs, re-run the Hi-Pot test to confirm that the switchgear is able to withstand voltages at least 50% greater than the name-plate rating. Of course all of this advice is worthless if the unit has already failed.

Remember that a Hi-pot is actually a destructive test. It challenges the insulation to the point of breakdown. Check the vendor recommendations before you Hi-pot equipment that has been in-service.

AQ: Frequent tripping in Unit Station Transformer

We are facing problem of frequent tripping in Unit Station Transformer -2 during heavy rain. During checking, not found any abnormalities
1. Fault UST2 OTI Trip Observation- * Direct OTI trip initiated without Alarm
* Oil temperature is normal
* Tripping contacts are not physically operated
* OTI trip contacts are operated frequently as per in Disturbance record Action taken-Spare Core of another cable used for OTI Trip contact

2. UST2 PRD Trip
* PRV contacts are not physically operated
* PRV trip contacts are operated frequently as per in Disturbance record New cable used for all contacts

Make sure for rainy conditions the marshalling box is properly closed and weather protected as moist condition also leads to tracking and may simulate tripping inadvertently. Please also make sure the tripping impulse from OTT/WTT/BT/MOG/PRD etc are driving a mechanical hand reset type VAJH type relay and the output contacts of this relays are used for trip ckt initiation.
If these are substituted by numerical relay binary inputs then also there will be a problem of spurious tripping.

Make sure the grounding of the multicore control cable if sheathed the grounding should be at TRPP panel end only, if armoured cable is used the armour grounding at the panel end only.’

I am assuming that the trip circuit is floating DC (ungrounded). If so, the moisture could be causing a “sneak” circuit, otherwise known as a “hot short” in the tripping circuit, which essentially bypasses the sensing relay contacts and actuates the tripping relay coil. I would check the cabling between the sensing relay contacts and the trip relay coil and the cabling on the hot side of the sensing relay contacts for insulation problems.

AQ: Transformer harmonics

The harmonics are created by the loads that the transformer supplies power to. If your loads include a high percentage of electronic loads like IT equipment, electronic ballast lighting, electronic motor controls, etc., there can be a very high amount of harmonics that circulate back to the transformer. The harmonics create an increase in the neutral currents. Most standard transformers are not designed to handle the higher harmonics and corresponding high temperature. Type K rated transformers are designed withstand the higher harmonics, without derating the transformer or limiting its maximum load. There are harmonics filters on the market as well as the use of isolation transformers.

B/H curve of the magnetic material forming the transformer core is not linear, so if a sinusoidal voltage is being applied for a sinusoidal current (and hence sinusoidal flux & a sinusoidal secondary voltage), the magnetizing current is not sinusoidal. Thus the magnetizing current of a transformer having an applied sinusoidal voltage will comprise a fundamental component and various harmonics. The magnitude and composition of these harmonics will depend on the magnetizing characteristic of the core material and the value of the peak flux density.

By the way:
– The standard Transformer “Non-saturated” generate Harmonics only in transient case when the power is supplied, and after this too small time it doesn’t generate any kind of Harmonics
– The Transformer generates Harmonics if it’s saturated
– We should take care when selecting the Transformer’s Power if there are a lot of installed Non-linear Loads, so for this case, we can select the power after define the correction factor by using the special curve done by “IEC”, or calculating this factor by using a special Formula done by “UTE – France”.

All AC signals are sinusoidal and periodic. These periodic signals can be resolved into a kind of trigonometric series – fourier series which is a summation of a fundamental and multiples of fundamental frequency.

The moment there is slight distortion from sinusoidal nature , it leads to harmonics in addition to the fundamental signal.. One way is to use DC signals… no harmonics.

As long as the AC signal is perfect sinusoidal , load & source is linear, there will be no harmonics. The way to get rid of harmonics is to have perfect source and perfect loads.

The non linearity introduced due to energy storing magnetic circuits, switching circuits, energy converting & inverting circuits distort the waveform to non sinusoidal. Therefore leads to harmonics. .

The way, there are antibiotic medicines for diseases. One needs to install the filter devices, which produce counter currents to suppress the effects of harmonics. The filters contain capacitors, inductors & power electronic components which are switched in anti-phase to harmonics producing elements. Thereby absorb harmonics.

AQ: Control Servo motor with a variable frequency drive

Looking at those AC drives they recommend an Induction motor. A servo motor with permanent magnets which is not quite an induction motor. So, if a servo with permanent magnets can be used instead an induction with these kinds of AC drives.

Actually, the term “Servo” makes a reference about “feedback”, it means, whether we need a control loop, we are talking in terms about Servo, in this case, we have, or we know, the “feedback” by an encoder. Typical variable frequency drive doesn’t have a input for an encoder, so, if you want to control a Servo Motor with a VFD, you can move the motor, but you can’t control it.

A servo motor can be an induction servo, a brushless servo, a reluctance servo a dc servo – each of these can be either linear or rotary and can come with a variety of feedback such as tachometer, resolver of various pole counts, incremental or absolute encoders discreet or serial interface with different bus options, laser feedback, halls etc.

Then you come to the term variable frequency drive. Brushless servo amplifiers are also vfds. Do standard inverters have proper control of induction, and brushless motors. Some allow for a software switch, some allow for a firmware download, some don’t. Will inverters accept feedback – some have it built in, most that allow it do so by option cards, many do not.

Normal input in a variable frequency drive is, digital to start or stop, and we could have an analogic input to control by potentiometer.

Using AC Drives for the servo application is quite possible, provided the application is less demanding in critical positioning purpose.
There are number of makes that showcases pinpoint positioning of motor shaft being driven by AC Drives like Hitachi SJ700 / Emerson Uni drive SP / Danfoss FC etc.

Its beneficial to opt for the AC Drives as it supports SLVC [ VFD gives almost servo-like torque at low rpms if you give it encoder feedback ], multiple motors can be accessed, torque requirement can be met if required, power dips can be sustained using VFD’s.

AQ: Why transformer rating is shown in KVA?

Transformers are rated in {VA, kVA, MVA etc.} due to flows of active and reactive power through transformer. In case of transformer we have active power losses as consequence of existence inside resistance of windings (primary and secondary) and existence of active losses of ferromagnetic core and other side we have reactive power losses as consequence of existence losses of magnetic flux (primary and secondary) and existence of reactive power losses of ferromagnetic core.

[VA]=sqrt(sqr[W]+sqr[VAr])

Transformer is rated in kVA by the manufacturer to inform users about the maximum power (voltage and current) that support it, the reason for not rating it in KW is that the active power (kW) is depend on the loads (lighting, machines..)

The simple answer is: It is because the kVA (or MVA) rating is only rating that matters to express a transformer’s “capacity” to allow the “passage” of power. That capacity is the thermal capacity dictated by the current it can carry at a given ambient temperature, regardless of the power factor. So combined with its voltage ratings, kVA (or MVA) is the value that matters. kW rating does not matter as transformer can handle unity power factor or in other words, a transformer can handle kW equal to its kVA rating at any time.

Remember that a transformer, as the name suggests, is only a transformation device or a pass through device and not a power producing device like a generator or an UPS, where their capacity to produce real power (kW) is an independent limit from the thermal ( kVA) limit.

To take it a step further, if you have an ability to cool the transformer further, you can augment the kVA (or MVA) rating of a transformer. This would explain having multiple kVA/ MVA ratings on transformers with forced cooling aids installed on them.

If you think of it, this is not different from a cable or a conductor’s capacity expression. Except that a transformer can have more than one voltage levels and different ampacities on primary and secondary, but the kVA rating remains the same on either side. So that makes kVA a more convenient way to express its thermal capacity vs. the amperes alone.

AQ: Difference between ICCB, MCCB and MCB

The aforementioned types of Circuit Breakers are used in LV System and generally based on the same operating principle.
MCB and MCCB/ICCB have a bimetal heater for overload which releases the Contact s while for short circuit the trip / electromagnet hammers itself against moving contacts. The arc created by breaking contacts is extinguished in an arc chamber. Are defined as “Thermo-magnetic “ CBs , accordingly. It is operating characteristic addressing the overload by thermal action of the bimetal strip and instantaneously dealing with short circuit occurrences by electromagnetic action.

MCB – Miniature Circuit Breaker is suitable for domestic usage. Used to protect final circuits from O/C such as Overload & Short Circuit.
i- MCB is basically made in accordance to BS 3871, is now superseded by BS EN 60898 which recognizes type B, C & D.
Type B is suitable in domestic premises.
Type C is used in commercial & industrial applications.
Type D is suitable for application where a high in-rush current is expected.
ii- MCB is of low breaking / making capacity as well as low current rating compared with MCCB/ICCB. MCBs available in different number of poles (SP, DP, TP,,).

MCCB – Molded Case Circuit Breaker & Insulated Case Circuit breaker are also current limiting devices but with high making/ breaking capacity and current ratings compared with MCB. MCCB and ICCB are almost the same and both are manufactured in accordance to NEMA AB1/AB3 to suit industrial and commercial purposes.
The advent of electronic protection increased the use of them and the scope is widened like tolerances, range of time & current adjustment. By virtue of that a good discrimination can be achieved with accuracy about ±10%.
Eventually, MCCB/ICCB has advantages in the capability of accommodating further features which can be provided as
i. RCD.
ii. Under voltage device.
iii. A shunt trip coils that enabling remote tripping.
iv. Auxiliary switches for remote monitoring and/or control.