Category: Blog

AQ: How to select a breaker?

Before breaker’s selecting for your electrical system, you need to calculate value of expected short circuit current at the place of breaker’s installation. Then you need to calculate value of heat pulse and 1s current (expected value of current during one second). After that you need to calculate power of breaker and finally, after all, you can select appropriate breaker. Values of characteristics of selected breaker need to be higher from calculated values of characteristics of your power system.

You can calculate operational current of breaker using this expression:

Inp=SnT/((sqrt(3))*Un)

After that, you need to calculate expected value of surge current:

kud=1+e(-0,01/Tae)
Iud=(sqrt(2))*kud*I’

After that, you need to calculate expected value of heat impulse:

A=(sqr(I0″))*Tae*(1-e(-2*ti/Tae))+(sqr(I’))*(ti+Td”)

And finally, you need to calculate 1s current (expected value of current during 1s):

I1s=sqrt(A/1s)

So, current of interruption of your breaker and power of interruption of your breaker are:

Ii=I’
Si=(sqrt(3))*Un*Ii

Additional expressions that you can use during your calculation:

I0″=Un/((sqrt(3))*Ze”);
I”=1,1*Un/((sqrt(3))*Ze”);
I’=1,15*Un/((sqrt(3))*Ze’);

where are:

ti-time of interruption
Inp-operational current of breaker
SnT-rated power of transformer
Un-rated voltage
kud-surge coefficient
Tae-time constant of aperiodic component of short circuit current
Iud-surge current
A-heat impulse
I0″-short circuit current in subtransient period (generators are in no-load conditions)
I’-short circuit current in transient period
Td”-time constant of subtransient component of short circuit current
I1s-current during one second
Ii=expected value of current of interruption of your breaker
Si=expected value of power of interruption of your breaker
Ze”-equivalent impedance of power system in the place of fault (subtransient period)
I”-short circuit current in subtransient period (generators are in full-load conditions)
I’-short circuit current in transient period
Ze’-equivalent impedanse of power system in the place of fault (transient period)

For a branch circuit feeding a single pump, you would generally size the circuit at 125% of the pump’s full-load amperage. If you’re not using a variable frequency drive or soft starter (which have built-in overload protection), you would use a Motor-circuit protector (MCP) breaker that has both thermal and magnetic trip capability. Sizing would be according the breaker manufacturer’s recommendations for a motor of a given horsepower, but not larger than would be required to protect the circuit conductors.

“The total load of an area” is much too ambiguous to answer. If you have lighting and receptacles, you’re going to need a different type of breaker than if you have motors or mixed types of load. There is no general approach. Circuit breaker types are very specific to the application.

Safety should not be taken lightly. Installing the wrong type of breaker could result in equipment damage and/or physical harm.

There are instantaneous breakers as well as time delay breakers. For time delay breaker, for example, you go 250% maximum of the rated current based upon the HP of a motor (look in the NEC), not on the nameplate label. The nameplate current value is for overload protection. Also try to size the breaker so that the conductors are protected.

As we kn

AQ: Motor line starting and ramp starting with VFD

Variable frequency drives are important power electronic devices. When we start an electric motor, we are increasing from 0 speed to full operating speed. A VFD ensures that the motor accelerates (increases its speed) to its full speed in a smooth manner, without causing much irregularities. In other words, VFDs make the motor accelerate uniformly.
VFDs are also easy to install and use. VFD drives are not only for starting motors (like the normal starters), but for easy speed control as well.

The difference between line starting a motor and ramp starting the motor with a variable frequency drive is that the motor/load does not pull the 6-7 times rated current of the motor, because the motor winding are not saturated with the full EMF produced to get the motor to synchronous speed it is ramped to it. If you are not trying to control the motors speed from process control then a soft start will serve the same purpose. The VFD drive main purpose is to control the V/F of the motor.

You will have to adjust the ramp time on the VFD or soft starter to over the force required to turn whatever the motor is turning, this can be accomplished with both devices. Soft starter is less expensive than variable frequency drive, thus it has limitations.

AQ: Difference between ICCB, MCCB and MCB

The aforementioned types of Circuit Breakers are used in LV System and generally based on the same operating principle.
MCB and MCCB/ICCB have a bimetal heater for overload which releases the Contact s while for short circuit the trip / electromagnet hammers itself against moving contacts. The arc created by breaking contacts is extinguished in an arc chamber. Are defined as “Thermo-magnetic “ CBs , accordingly. It is operating characteristic addressing the overload by thermal action of the bimetal strip and instantaneously dealing with short circuit occurrences by electromagnetic action.

MCB – Miniature Circuit Breaker is suitable for domestic usage. Used to protect final circuits from O/C such as Overload & Short Circuit.
i- MCB is basically made in accordance to BS 3871, is now superseded by BS EN 60898 which recognizes type B, C & D.
Type B is suitable in domestic premises.
Type C is used in commercial & industrial applications.
Type D is suitable for application where a high in-rush current is expected.
ii- MCB is of low breaking / making capacity as well as low current rating compared with MCCB/ICCB. MCBs available in different number of poles (SP, DP, TP,,).

MCCB – Molded Case Circuit Breaker & Insulated Case Circuit breaker are also current limiting devices but with high making/ breaking capacity and current ratings compared with MCB. MCCB and ICCB are almost the same and both are manufactured in accordance to NEMA AB1/AB3 to suit industrial and commercial purposes.
The advent of electronic protection increased the use of them and the scope is widened like tolerances, range of time & current adjustment. By virtue of that a good discrimination can be achieved with accuracy about ±10%.
Eventually, MCCB/ICCB has advantages in the capability of accommodating further features which can be provided as
i. RCD.
ii. Under voltage device.
iii. A shunt trip coils that enabling remote tripping.
iv. Auxiliary switches for remote monitoring and/or control.

AQ: VFD PWM and PAM definition

PWM is shorted for Pulse Width Modulation, it’s a variable frequency drive (VFD) regulate way to change the pulse width according to certain rules to adjust the output volume and waveform.

PAM is shorted for Pulse Amplitude Modulation, it’s to change the pulse amplitude according to certain rules pulse amplitude pulse train to adjust the variable frequency drive output volume and waveform.

AQ: The basis of rating a NGR in electrical system

NGR stands for Neutral Grounding Resistor. When an earth fault current occurs on a plant, assuming that there is no external device presented to limit the earth fault current, the magnitude of the earth fault current is limited only by the earth impedance presented between the point of fault (to earth) and the return path (typically a star point of a transformer). If the earth impedance is low (type of soil being one of the reason amongst others), the fault current magnitude can be significantly high, and if left unchecked could damage the primary equipment. It is therefore mandatory that the earth fault current be limited to a suitable value, which is typically the rated value of the plant as a thumb rule. Why use the rated value? Because the plant has been designed to carry the rated current continuously.

Let’s take an example: say you have a transformer 60MVA, 132/33kV Star-Delta transformer. It is required to calculate the value of NGR to be connected to the zig-zag transformer on the 33kV Delta. the value of the resistor required to limit the earth fault current to the transformer’s LV rated value is (33 x 33) / 60 = 18.15 Ohms.

(Earth Fault current limited to rated value = (60 x 1000) / (1.732 x 33) = 1050A) When you go to a supplier you might find he supplies only 20 ohms resistor (as you might not get the exact value that you have calculated theoretically). No problem, use the 20 ohms and calculate what your new value of earth fault current would be (33 x 1000 / (1.732 x 20) = 952.6A, which is less than the transformer’s rated LV current. So you’re safe. This is how I would go about. In fact I would go a step further and introduce a safety factor of 20% i.e. I’ll bump up the value of the resistor from 20 ohms by an extra 20% and buy a resistor/ NGR of 1.2 x 20 = 24 ohms. So I am 100% sure that the earth fault current is way below the rated value and my transformer will be safe, even if the fault current goes undetected for any unforeseen reason say my earth fault protection has failed to pick up.

Make sure however that the earth fault setting that you choose is sensitive enough to pick up for the earth fault current calculated. I would generally put two relays a 64 or REF designed to pick up and operate instantly backed by a 51N with a sensitive setting but with a delay of a couple of seconds to pick up in case the 64 has failed to pick up.

So that’s it. I have described how I would go about calculating the earth fault current, selection of NGR value and how I would protect it.
Protection and related devices aiding protection don’t come cheap. Also I assume by your comment “this method is the most expensive option available since the cost of the transformer shall be astronomical”, you are referring to the Zig-Zag transformer and not the actual 132/33kV Star-Delta power transformer, under question.

I have taken a very generic example and tried to focus on how to arrive at a suitable value of an NGR, assuming an Star HV and Delta LV. My aim being to calculate how I could limit the fault current on the Delta LV. Being a Delta winding, I have to use a Zig-Zag transformer, for providing a low zero sequence path for the flow of earth fault current. It is really the Zig-Zag trafo. that bumps up the cost.

Note: If the above transformer is one of a kind, i.e. this is the only transformer in an isolated network, then I simply disregard the Zig-Zag transformer + NGR method and use the 3 PT broken delta method for 3Vo detection to drive a 59N. My cost here would be very low.

If the transformer is a Star-Star type with HV start solidly grounded, and LV star impedance (NGR) grounded, then I don’t need a Zig-Zag trafo. on the LV side. My cost is purely for the NGR alone.(Of course this transformer will have a Delta tertiary which may need it’s own protection depending on the whether one plans to load the tertiary or not. We could di

AQ: Difference between PLC and DDC system

PLC is defined as Programmable Logic Controller. It is a hardware, Includes processor, I/P & O/P Modules, Counters, Function Blocks, Timers,,, etc. The I/Os are either Analogue or Digitals or both. PLC can be configured to suit the application and to programmed in a logic manner by using one of the programing language such as Statement List, Ladder Diagram,, etc Interaction in real time between inputs and the resultant of the outputs through the program logic – PID – gives the entire Control System. While the Digital Control System I believe it is Software/ System that uses only Digital Signals for control and PLC/PC/Server/Central Unit may constitutes an Integral part of this system.

AQ: Power Transformer power losses

Power losses of ferromagnetic core depend from voltage and frequency. In case where is no-load secondary winding, power transformer has a power losses in primary winding (active and reactive power losses) which are very small, due to low current of primary winding (less than 1% of rated current) and power losses of ferromagnetic core (active and reactive power losses) which are the highest in case of rated voltage between ends of primary winding…

Of course, we can give voltage between the ends of primary winding of power transformer (voltage who is higher from rated voltage), but we need include some limits before that:

1. if we increase voltage in the primary winding of power transformer (voltage who is higher from rated voltage), we need to set down frequency, otherwise ferromagnetic core of power transformer will come in area of saturation, where are losses to high, which has a consequence warming of ferromagnetic core of power transformer and finally, has a consequence own damage,

2. if we increase voltage in the primary winding of power transformer (voltage who is higher from rated voltage), also intensity of magnetic field and magnetic induction will rise until “knee point voltage”: after that point, we can’t anymore increase magnetic induction, because ferromagnetic core is in area of saturation…

In that case, current of primary winding of power transformer is just limited by impedance of primary winding… By other side, in aspect of magnetising current, active component of this current is limited by resistance of ferromagnetic core, while is reactive component of this current limited by reactance of ferromagnetic core.

There is a finite amount of energy or power that can be handled by various ferromagnetic materials used for core material. Current increases greatly with relatively small voltage increases when you are over the knee of the magnetization curve characterized by the hysteresis loop. Nickel/steel mix materials saturate at lower flux densities than silicon steel materials. 50ni/50fe materials saturate at about 12kG; 80Ni/20Fe as low as 6kG. Vanadium Permendur material saturates at levels as high as 22kGauss- Nano-crystallines- 12.5kG (type), Ferrites -typically over 4kG at room, decreasing as temperature rises. What causes saturation?: Exceeding material limits.

AQ: What is ANSYS software?

This is a finite element analysis tool for various applications.
In power we get the voltage (stress) distribution in equipment like cables, bends in cables etc including stator winding of generators.

Once you go deep into it the applications become more apparent.  In mechanical engineering using FEM you can identify the stresses in each member of the structure and so on.

I believe ANSYS, Abacus, Nashtran etcare extensively used for detailed analysis of stresses including electrical stresses. Some of the above offer introductory courses on line.
One needs extensive and considerable insight into partial differential equations and advanced mathematics.

AQ: Transmission line low voltages and overload situations

Q: I want to know just what the surge impedance loading (SIL) is but its relevance towards the improvement of stability and reliability of a power network especially an already existing one with various degrees of low voltages and overload situations?

A: The surge impedance loading will provide you with an easy way of determining if your transmission line is operated as a net reactor (above SIL, so external sources of (2) line-voltage-drop limitation
(3) steady-state-stability limitation

In contrast with the line voltage drop limitation, the steady state stability limitation has been discussed quite extensively in the technical literature.

However, one important point is rarely made or given proper emphasis; that is, the stability limitation should take the complete system into account, not just the line alone. This has been a common oversight which, for the lower voltage lines generally considered in the past, has not led to significant misinterpretations concerning line loadability

At higher voltage classes such as 765 kV and above, the typical levels of equivalent system reactance at the sending and receiving end of a line become a significant factor which cannot be ignored in determining line loadability as limited by stability considerations, so surge impedance loading plays a fundamental role in reliability and stability.

AQ: Transformer Saturation