Category: Blog

Home  ›  Blog  ›  Page 27

AQ: Stiff voltage sources

Stiff voltage sources are not problematic as long as they don’t get in the way of the solver’s attempts to linearize the behavior of the circuit matrix via step size reduction. It is the highly nonlinear stiff sources that are heavily fed back into the rest of the circuitry that can cause the solver to hang. Linear sources that are ground referenced or nonlinear ones that don’t feed back anywhere are not likely to cause problems.

In the initial versions of SPICE there were a few elements that could not be simulated directly with nodal analysis in the circuit’s admittance matrix, ideal inductors and voltage sources being the most common among them. However, starting with some version of SPICE 2 this deficiency was removed when modified nodal analysis (MNA) was added to the simulation engine (requiring an additional computational enhancement sometimes called the auxiliary matrix, I believe).

Modified nodal analysis is an extension of nodal analysis which not only determines the circuit’s node voltages (as in classical nodal analysis), but also some branch currents. This permits the simulation engine to crunch ideal inductors and voltages sources (true Thevenin circuit elements) but at a cost of incrementally increasing the matrix size and difficultly about twice as much as for when “easy” Norton type elements (e.g., resistors, capacitors and current sources) are added.

In other words, adding one ideal inductor slows down the simulation about as much as adding two ideal capacitors. However, there is a small additional silver lining to this, as it also comes with the possible advantage of “free” (whether you use it or not) automatic sensing of instantaneous inductor current.

LTspice (my simulator of choice) treats inductors in a special way in that they are normally given a default series resistance of 1 m-ohm unless a value of zero is explicitly entered for that parameter. Having a non-zero series resistance allows LTspice to “Nortonize” the inductor such that it can be processed as a normal branch within the circuit matrix, thereby allowing the simulation to run marginally faster. This also makes the inductor “look” like any other of the “easy” elements so that it is not a numerical problem to parallel it with a stiff voltage source. If a series resistance parameter is entered for a voltage source, it also becomes Nortonized by LTspice.

Nortonizing an inductor or voltage source comes at the cost of giving up free sensing of the instantaneous branch current, which is not a cost at all if this current is not being used elsewhere. However, as soon as you call out the inductor current in *any way* in any b-source behavioral expression, LTspice changes the default series resistance for that inductor back to zero ohms and reverts back to the standard MNA way of processing it within the circuit matrix so that it can get access to the inductor’s instantaneous current.

Only true Thevenin type elements have the possibility of being used as the instantaneous current sense for a current controlled switch (or other similar current controlled devices). The SPICE standard is to only allow voltage sources for this purpose, but apparently LTspice accepts zero ohm inductors as well.

One last note, LTspice is indeed able to measure the current in any element, including Norton type devices, but for these devices the current measured will necessarily be a time delayed version that may not be suitable for tight feedback loops (there is a warning about this in the LTspice Help file section on b-sources).

AQ: Cleaning solvent for motor windings

Usually, the dry ice approach is the best bet because it leaves no real residue from the cleaning material. If the insulation is “fluffing”, the likely problem is that the air pressure used to move the dry ice particles is too high.

A second alternative that can be used is “corn cob blasting”. The media is reusable, biodegradable particles of corn husks. Again, a relatively low pressure air stream is required. It WILL damage the insulation if the pressure is too high, just as in the dry ice case.

Most solvents will aggressively attack the insulation systems used for windings: this is specifically true for the larger machines where mica tapes are coated / filled with a resinous material (vacuum pressure impregnation). However, it is equally true for smaller machines where the primary insulation is at the strand level and is essentially a varnish or enamel coating on the wire. If you’re worried about how the solvent will affect the insulation system, get in touch with the motor supplier for their suggested approach.

If a solvent-based cleaner must be used, it should be applied sparingly – BY HAND – on the areas to be cleaned to break up the oily / greasy contaminant and then rewashed with some other (non-solvent) approach to clean away any solvent residue. This also will require a “dry out” of the equipment after the second washing. This three-stage approach tends to minimize damage done by solvent that may be left behind to “eat away” at the varnishes, enamels, and resins comprising the insulation system.

One last thing – pretty much ALL solvents are going to be designated as hazardous materials in most regions, due to health concerns. Therefore it is more a case of “pick your poison”!

AQ: Why companies don’t invest in variable frequency drive control

Investing in energy efficient variable frequency drives (VFD) seems like an obvious path to cutting a company’s operating costs, but it is one that many companies ignore. This article explores some possible reasons for this reluctance to invest in VFD.

There is a goldmine of savings waiting to be unlocked by controlling electric motors, but the reluctance to take advantage of this is a very puzzling phenomenon. Motors consume about two thirds of all electrical energy used by industry and cost 40 times more to run than to buy, so you would think optimizing their efficiency would be a priority. The reality is that this good idea is not always turned into good practice and many businesses are missing out on one of the best opportunities to boost profits and variable frequency drive growth.

It might surprise you to learn that your average 11kW motor may cost about £500 to buy but £120,000 to run at 8,000 hours per year over a 15-year lifetime (and that isn’t even accounting for inevitable increases in energy prices). It’s worth considering the payback on any investment in motor control that will reduce this significant running cost, such as using VFDs to control speed, or implementing automated starting and stopping when the motor is not needed. Payback times can often be less than 1 year and, of course, the savings continue over the lifetime of the system, particularly as energy costs rise.

The question that often arises when I talk about this subject to people is: “If the savings are so great, why don’t more people do this?” It would appear to be something that fits into the nobrainer category, however there are three main barriers to the wider uptake of motor control with variable frequency drive, none of which should stop common sense from prevailing – but all too often they do.

The first barrier is a lack of awareness of how much energy is being consumed, and where, in a business. A surprising number of companies do not have a nominated energy manager, still less have energy management as a dedicated job function or have a board member responsible for this significant cost. Those that do measure their energy consumption often have a financial rather than technical bias, so solutions tend towards renegotiating supply contracts, rather than reducing consumption.

The second barrier stems from the economic climate and the level of uncertainty about future events and policies. Businesses are still reluctant to invest in improvement projects, despite short payback periods and the ongoing benefits. The short-term focus is on cutting costs, not on spending money, even to the detriment of future growth. This make-do-and-mend attitude is often proudly touted as a strength, but it is ultimately a false economy. Saving money by cutting capital budgets, reducing staff and cancelling training is damaging to a business and to morale, making it difficult to grow again when the opportunity arises. Saving money by reducing energy consumption makes a business more competitive, while keeping hold of key skills and resources.

The third barrier is a focus on purchase cost, rather than lifetime cost. Whenever a business invests in a machine, a production line or a ventilation system, you can be sure they will have a rigorous process for getting several quotes, usually comparing price, with the lowest bid winning. Something that is not often evaluated is the lifetime energy cost of the system. Competing suppliers will seek to reduce the capital cost of the equipment but without considering the true cost for the operator, including energy consumption. What if the cost of automation and motor control added £700 to the purchase cost? Many suppliers will consider cutting this from the specification. But what if that control saved £1,400 per year in energy? It co

AQ: Different brushes at same ring

Recently I had to do a report explain why is impossible join brushes, at same time, from different companies, even with same characteristics.
I used the follow points:
1 – Even with same characteristics the final results is different because tue proportion of material and/or manufacturing process different lead to a different brushes;
2 – Guarantee, because our machine is new, and is a good practice use brushes recommended by Manufacturer;
3 – The film, that is formed on the rings by the brushes could change (but I don’t have any sure if chage for bad);

Unfortunately my report was based on experience for old engineer and recommendation of Manufacturer.

One
of the most important thing about brushes in high current density
environments is uniformity. If there are any variations in material
composition, manufacturing methods, dimensions, porosity, density,
surface hardness, friction coefficient, pig-tail attaching means, size
of pig-tail conductor, etc., there will be a variation in the current
division and/or wear.

Ultimately some brushes will carry more current than others and the increased current density in those brushes will lead to overheating, pitting, scoring, and ultimately costly repairs to the commutator/slip-rings. You might also accidentally mix brush grades when dealing with multiple vendors.

Although manufacturers publish data for brush materials which may prove to be very close to one another, mixing them on a collector surface is not a good practice. Any signs of undesirable performance would be difficult to identify the root cause for and small differences in electrical resistance can produce staggeringly varied performance from each brush.

While the materials used have good material data supplied with them, the manufacturing of the cable connection does not which can account for many times the resistivity differences of the material. Brush manufacturers do use a variety of materials here also and so some brushes, even of the same grade and from the same supplier but with different connection material, cannot be used together.

Mixing of grades is an uncontrolled practice which leads to variable surface conditions especially where the numbers of each grade used is not controlled.

Lower resistance brushes will “grab” the current possibly over filming the collector surface leaving the higher resistance brushes to run at lower than prescribed minimum current densities which results in higher coefficients of friction at the brush/collector interface. You would never know when your film is stable which endangers machine life.

Most machine manufacturers select a grade of carbon to use which is useful at the machines fully rated capacity. However, manufacturing tolerances, specifications etc can produce a machine vastly over rated for your application. Running the manufacturers supplied brushes at reduced load can be very damaging. Most Manufacturers will accept that you need another brush grade for your specific use and will maintain warranty provided they have been consulted regarding any changes.

Many overlook that by moving a machine from one position in their plant to another, that they well need to consider the brush grade at that time also. Sometimes a simple and cost effective reduction of brushes (of the same grade) within the machine can increase plant reliability and longevity dramatically. Other times a consultation with a brush expert can lead to an alternative grade to produce better performance.

AQ: Variable Air Volume System Optimization

Variable Air Volume Systems (VAV) can be optimized to increase energy savings by maximizing the efficiency of the equipment at part-load conditions. The goal with the optimization strategy is to run each subsystem (chiller, cooling tower, Airhandler, etc) in the most efficient way possible while maintaining the current building load requirement.

VAV System Optimization

As each Variable Air Volume terminal controls the space temperature – based on flow – the “worst case” zone can easily be identified by an automation system. The supply fan speed can be reduced by resetting the static pressure (see following page). As the load drops and the fan meets a preset minimum flow, the system resets the air temperature up, so less chilled water is needed. In a variable flow chiller system, this reduces pumping energy.

If the system load continues to drop, the system will reset the chiller supply water temperature upward which will then reduce the energy requirements of the chiller. Changes in the chiller head pressure and loads can then reset the cooling tower fan speed.

The key to optimizing the system operation is communication and information sharing through the entire system equipment. With the reduced cost of variable frequency drives and Building Automation Systems, (BAS) complete system optimization can be implemented as a cost effective option.

In VAV systems where the individual VAV boxes and the AHU are on a building automation system, additional savings can be achieved by implementing static pressure reset. The static pressure sensor in a VAV system is typically located two-thirds of the way downstream in the main supply air duct for many existing systems. Static pressure is maintained by modulating the fan speed.

When the static pressure is lower than the setpoint, the fan speeds up to provide more airflow (static) to meet the VAV box needs, and vice-versa. A constant set point value is usually used regardless of the building load conditions.

Under partial-load conditions the static pressure required at the terminal VAV boxes may be far less than this constant set point. The individual boxes will assume a damper position to satisfy the space temperature requirements. For example, various VAV box dampers will be at different damper positions, (some at 70% open, 60% open, etc) very few will be at design, ie 95% -100% open.

RESET STRATEGY
Essentially, resetting supply air static pressure requires that every VAV box is sampled with the static reset set to the worst case box requirement. For example, each box is polled, every 5 minutes. If no box is more than 95% open, reduce duct static pressure set point by 5%. If one or more boxes exceed 95% open, increase static pressure set point by 5%.

With a lower static set point to maintain, fan speed reduces. The result is increased energy savings in the 3 to 8% range. See figure below. If the BAS system is already installed, implementing this strategy is relatively free.
Variable Air Volume System energy savings

AQ: Renewable Energy in India

Holistic and Combined i.e Hybrid Renewable Energy Generation per Taluka / District of Each state with Energy Potential study with Investment seeking proposal with land (barren) identified with Revenue department clearances and also with a clear MAP of Evacuation with existing Transmission lines and future lines to planned, which shall be appended to RfP and not ask each developer to identify the location and struggle with Government Administration (which will increase time and Costs (read wrong costs)) complying to Land Acquisition bill and also eliminate the real estate babus to relinquish 5000 acres of land per state, which is BENAMI now…..I do not know how this excess land in BENAMI exist when we have Land ceiling Act!!

In order to do an extensive and credible study to explore renewable energy potential in each Taluka, State and Central Government Can hire international Consultancies with Video Documentation with GPRS MAPS to know the real truth and there shall not be much difference between reports and the ground reality, otherwise, hold these agencies responsible with necessary punitive clauses.

These costs can be recovered in the form of Bid document charges, which any serious developer will pay. However, the Equity selling proxy promoters, who have access to the power corridor and bid with Net worth Financial capacity, but, not worthy of any Renewable energy promotion as we saw in JNNSM wherein a large corporate bought equity from the other bidders and later an investigation took place…..

Following is the excerpts of the Mail written to MNRE and KREDL, in Jan 2012 (now we see their web site showing Biomass study is under progress):

For Power evacuation, we need to know the following (as we can’t use the existing data):

a). Distance from the Power generation site, which normally comes under KREDL (single window agency) i.e where one can put up the plant by undergoing NA or KREDL has identified land bank in Yadgir, but, how many km is the Substation from these sites, which we verified, was difficult to ascertain due to patch lands and the distance was over 10 km in certain cases.

b). Whether these substations can accept 20 MW or 10 MW or 5 MW of intermittent Solar PV load (non firm power which at times may create grid related disturbances etc). Biomass power is firm power as long as Firm biomass feed stock is available.

Therefore, we have been writing to many agencies involved to come out with a common approach, wherein the bidding documents identify clearly the SLDCs where the Project Developer can upload (evacuate) the energy generated with an in principle approval (with location MAP with transmission distances etc) from SLDC and ESCOM to accept such Renewable energy as the States are bound to buy the RE under RPO.

If the investor or RE Generator has to run around to know the fundamentals, then, please try to imagine how many man hours will be wasted and how much money gets drained from many participants for the same location? Instead, these data is available with KPTCL / KREDL / KERC / ESCOMs or such multiple organisation, but, Single window agency KREDL does not produce such VITAL information in their bid documents, hence, we as entrepreneurs are trying to tie the loose ends and make things happen for the good of our state.

I hope you understand our concern and append the finer details of evacuation, project site, land bank, the maximum capacity of MWh the substation can take or any upgrade is needed etc be appended in the bidding documents or even in your web sites also.

Further, any new substations are under development, the same with a clearly identified MAP with distances will help the people to understand the grid network to ensure the grid sustainability, reduction in transmission lines and hence the losses can be planned while making the bids, which otherwise will be a

AQ: Frequency Inverter Direct Digital Control

Modulating Supply & Return Fans are used as a means of providing proper variable air volume (VAV) control as well as building pressurization. Many such VAV systems are still largely pneumatic with static to the downstream boxes being maintained by inlet guide vanes. To provide increased energy savings and energy comfort, these systems can be easily converted to frequency inverter fan control of the supply and return fans and Direct Digital Control (DDC) to coordinate any increased energy saving strategies. Figure 1 shows such a system.

Frequency Inverter Direct Digital Control

To increase energy savings, the DDC controller can be programmed to reduce the flow from the return & supply fans for short periods of time. Coordinated with the building pressurization system, any temporary loss of space temperature may be avoided.

In Figure 1, the supply fan is controlled by the duct static pressure sensor, via the DDC, while the outside air and mixed air dampers are optimized to provide economizer control.. The return fan is modulated to stabilize building pressure at a slight positive. For simple supply and exhaust systems the building pressure and static pressure sensors may be connected directly to the frequency inverter with an internal PID controller.

Typical Energy Savings are realized from converting pneumatic (or electromechanical) control to DDC control with frequency inverter in the following ways:

  • Locking inlet guide valves mechanically open to allow the frequency inverter to fully modulate the fans.
  • Free cooling by accurately modulating the economizer dampers and sequencing the mechanical equipment.
  • Controlling static and resetting the static pressure during short periods of time.
  • Accurate building pressurization.
  • Implementing other energy saving measures which include supply air reset, and night purge routines.

CONTROL CONSIDERATIONS

  • Placement of the indoor static pressure sensor is important as it should provide a stable signal. Entrances, dock, and other areas where large , sudden static pressure changes may occur should be avoided.
  • The outside reference static tip should be shielded from wind and rain.
  • When the exhaust fan is frequency inverter controlled, consider a 2-position air damper to prevent the outside air from entering the building (infiltration) when the exhaust fan is off or a very low speeds.
  • For simple VAV systems, consider using frequency inverters with built in PID controls such as the Iacdrive frequency inverters.. This minimizes hardware and installation costs. Static sensors provide a 0-10vdc control signal directly to the frequency inverter.
  • Duct mounted static pressure sensor should be mounted 2/3 of the distance of the distribution system.

AQ: Why designing an ethernet network IP scheme?

Depends on the size of the network (# of devices planned on connecting), for medium to large corporate networks go 10.x, for home and small business 192.168.x, or to 172.16.x. I would think the IP plan would be looking at least 10 – 20 years out. Changing IP schemes is hard, especially on a controls LAN, you wouldn’t want to undertake this task to frequently. Also consider any routing / firewalling / DMZing that you may want to do between the controls LAN and the business network (ideally these are separated networks).

Here’s some things to consider:

Number of devices or potential devices on the network
You may want to use a Class A subnet when you have or will have a large number of devices or a Class C when you have or will have a small number of devices.

Amount of traffic
A large subnet will more likely expose devices to more traffic. A smaller network may be employed to segment and/or control the amount of data that must be handled by a device.

Security
A large network (e.g., Class A) network may be more difficult to restrict access to or exposure of devices.

Simplicity
A Class A network is a flatter architecture and may be simpler to manage because you don’t have to worry about routing, gateways, and/or firewalls as much. This has to be balanced with security and traffic issues though.

Others
There are other considerations too…

In my experience, connecting with the “business” side of things is not technically difficult with an appropriate firewall/router. However, I have often found that the political challenges are more difficult. I have often butted heads with IT folks who have a fortress mentality and don’t understand the constraints, limitations, restrictions, and special considerations needed for industrial control systems. Many times, the best solution is to have a well defined line of demarcation where the IT folks take care of their side and the control guys take care of the control side. Most IT folks are OK with that as long as they can quarantine the control side to their satisfaction.

When it comes to selecting the firewall/router, you will need to take into consideration the protocols passing through it. If it’s the nominal business protocols like http, ftp, rdp, ssh, etc., then any business class device will typically work. However, if industrial protocols like CIP, Ethernet/IP, or OPC will be passing through, you will need to confirm that the firewall/router supports them specifically. When making the link, the important thing is the type of packet filtering and address translation rules that are configured in the firewall router. The IT folks might be more happy if they can setup a VLAN just for the controls.

AQ: Rotary Tube Furnace Efficiency

There are many factors that govern the performance of rotary tube furnaces. A direct fired rotary unit has a potential for much higher thermal efficiency due to the direct contact of the hot gases with the material in process. Cement kilns are the most common large scale unit operation with direct fired units. Any articles you find on this will be helpful. Thermal efficiency can be estimated by dividing the inlet temperature minus the outlet temperature by the inlet temperature minus the ambient temperature in absolute scales either Rankine or Kelvin. Then there is the issue of co-current versus counter-current firing and heat recovery from the hot material and the exit gas for which standard designs are available. Indirect fired rotary kilns have heat transfer limitations due to the thickness and alloys needed for high temperature calcination >500 C. There is no simple way to measure the equivalent of the inlet and outlet temperatures on a direct fired unit. There are simply exit gas temperatures from each zone and an approximate shell temperature on the hot side of the shell which is lower than the zone exit gas temp. These are useful for control purposes and consistent operation. The higher the temperature the material requires to achieve conversion the higher the shell side fired temperature has to be to provide the delta T necessary to drive heat through the shell into the material zone.

Some materials further limit heat transfer by adhering to the inside of the shell and acting as an insulator! This requires trial and error application of “knockers” at the ends of the shell or sometimes internally secured chains that bang around and knock the adhering material loose. This is a potential nightmare as the learning curve to install chains so that the securing lugs and the chains themselves will stay attached for acceptably long service before failing and ending up in the take off conveying equipment with usual breakage and downtime is an uncertain one. From Perry’s one can find thermal efficiencies for indirect fired rotary’s given as less than 35%. The bed fill can be 10-30% depending on the heat demand of the material and the heat transfer limitations. You will want to have real time gas usage metering on the burners so that you know the theoretical energy input. From that you can subtract the theoretical heat needed to complete your reaction and compare that to the input to see how efficiently you have used the energy input.

The few large high temperature direct fired rotary kilns I have seen had view ports for measuring the local wall temperatures by optical pyrometer. It can be a challenge to get a protected thermocouple sheath down into the moving bed for an actual bed temperature and even just to hang it in the gas streams at the outlet or inlet area. See if you can contact cement kiln suppliers for some configurations of temperature sensing elements for your application. Bed fill effects on heat transfer are related to several parameters. Above ~500 C gas and refractory liner temperatures, the main heat transfer mode will be radiative as far as the surface of the bed material. Within the bed it will be conduction and some convection at the surface. A thin bed will reach max. temperature in shorter time, but this reduces through put for a given gas temperature. If you increase bed fill to increase production you will have to increase the firing temperature and the outlet temperature will probably increase lowering your thermal efficiency. This becomes a trade off between production rate and energy efficiency. Countercurrent firing usually maintains the highest driving force for heat transfer along the bed and gives the highest temperature of the bed just before exit of the bed material.

Perry’s may have a useful section on direct fired rotary kilns and lime or cement manufacturing references may help you as well. Please make sure lead emissions to air are properly captured

AQ: Low impedance fault

A low impedance fault is usually a bolted fault, which is a short circuit. It allows a high amount of fault current to flow, and an upstream breaker or fuse usually senses the high current and operates, ending the event. A high impedance fault, usually an arc fault, is a fault of too high of an impedance for overcurrent protection to detect and operate, so the fault exists for long period of time without tripping upstream protection. Examples of arc faults are: A high or medium voltage distribution utility wire falling to earth in a Y grounded system and arcing to earth where no breaker or fuse will clear; another example is any fault tracking through a substance such as cable insulation or even air….this could be wiring within a building wall with a fault that lasts long enough to ignite the building wall it is installed in, which happens all the time somewhere (sometimes called “arc through char”). Another high impedance fault is one within a transformer secondary coil, arcing through the coil insulation and transformer oil (oil cooled units)…the arc will boil the oil into component gases such as acetylene and hydrogen and if the arc fault lasts long enough and gets to the gases, the gases may explode…and the primary fuse protection will likely not detect this for some time. There are many other examples of high impedance faults. One way to tell a high impedance fault or arc fault is if there is a protecting breaker or fuse that did not operate for a fault…if the breaker or fuse are correctly sized and working properly and did not operate that usually indicates a high impedance fault….a short circuit usually generates high enough current to trigger breaker/fuse operations (assuming normal circuit impedance is low). Another way to look at it is any fault in a power circuit with an impedance such that less than “available” fault current flows.