Blog – Page 11 – AC DRIVES SOLUTION.

AQ: System configuration of grounding

There are different types of system configuration for grounding like TT,IT,TN-C etc. How do we decide which configuration is suitable for the particular inverter (string or central). What are the factors that help us to decide the configurations?

One of the main concerns in a system is to avoid large low impedance ground loops.
These are created by the return signal path connected to the chassis (metal work) at multiple points. The large current loop allows noise currents to radiate H fields and hence couple into other electronics. The antenna effect will be proportional to loop area.

Single point grounding of the return path to chassis prevents this. However single point grounding conflicts with good RF practice where you want to ground to chassis at the sending and receiving ends of a signal path. There is therefore no universal best practice.

In my field, spacecraft, the standard practice has all primary power electronics galvanically isolated from the spacecraft chassis. Individual modules must maintain the isolation with transformer coupled DC/DC converters. The centre tap of each PSU secondary output is then single point grounded to the module metalwork. We talk about primary side and secondary side electronics where only secondary side is grounded to the metalwork.

Anything powered directly from the primary bus must be isolated with a maximum capacitance to chassis of 50nF to avoid excess HF loop currents forming.

In general it depends on country specific law and standards required by Power Supply Operators. From design point of view it all depends on which point of grid you are going to connect and what type of inverter is used.

AQ: Lighting control panel to distribution board

There are a couple of construction differences which may be present, depending on the style of “lighting control panel”.

First, a distribution board typically has poly-phase branch breakers with the intention of feeding either other sub-panels or large loads — such as a motor with a motor controller.

A lighting control panel will have mostly single-pole breakers with phase-to-neutral branch circuits feeding lighting circuitry. There is the added possibility of having either ‘smart’ breakers or integral contactors included on the branch circuits to allow for a control means for area lighting beyond local control of an individual fixture/small group of fixtures, such as an office or conference room.

In general
1. The final branch circuits to be identified and rating load to be estimated.
2. Adequate utilization/diversity Factor to be applied if applicable (depends on the application).
3. To ensure the load balance over the 3 Phase as possible.
4. For Fluorescent light fixtures arrangement of the said fixtures with respect (RYB phases) is necessary to mitigate rendering/glaring and frequency affect.
5. Then size of cable from DB to LCP can be determined/sized, rating of the protective devices can be selected and type of CB(s) subject to type of lighting fixtures.
6. Verification of Voltage drop within the prescribed limit, otherwise select the next standard cable size.

A distribution board typically has poly-phase branch breakers with the intention of feeding either other sub-panels or large loads and lighting control panel (is also one type of distribution panel) will have mostly single-pole breakers with phase-to-neutral branch circuits feeding lighting circuitry.

AQ: The basis of rating a NGR in electrical system

NGR stands for Neutral Grounding Resistor. When an earth fault current occurs on a plant, assuming that there is no external device presented to limit the earth fault current, the magnitude of the earth fault current is limited only by the earth impedance presented between the point of fault (to earth) and the return path (typically a star point of a transformer). If the earth impedance is low (type of soil being one of the reason amongst others), the fault current magnitude can be significantly high, and if left unchecked could damage the primary equipment. It is therefore mandatory that the earth fault current be limited to a suitable value, which is typically the rated value of the plant as a thumb rule. Why use the rated value? Because the plant has been designed to carry the rated current continuously.

Let’s take an example: say you have a transformer 60MVA, 132/33kV Star-Delta transformer. It is required to calculate the value of NGR to be connected to the zig-zag transformer on the 33kV Delta. the value of the resistor required to limit the earth fault current to the transformer’s LV rated value is (33 x 33) / 60 = 18.15 Ohms.

(Earth Fault current limited to rated value = (60 x 1000) / (1.732 x 33) = 1050A) When you go to a supplier you might find he supplies only 20 ohms resistor (as you might not get the exact value that you have calculated theoretically). No problem, use the 20 ohms and calculate what your new value of earth fault current would be (33 x 1000 / (1.732 x 20) = 952.6A, which is less than the transformer’s rated LV current. So you’re safe. This is how I would go about. In fact I would go a step further and introduce a safety factor of 20% i.e. I’ll bump up the value of the resistor from 20 ohms by an extra 20% and buy a resistor/ NGR of 1.2 x 20 = 24 ohms. So I am 100% sure that the earth fault current is way below the rated value and my transformer will be safe, even if the fault current goes undetected for any unforeseen reason say my earth fault protection has failed to pick up.

Make sure however that the earth fault setting that you choose is sensitive enough to pick up for the earth fault current calculated. I would generally put two relays a 64 or REF designed to pick up and operate instantly backed by a 51N with a sensitive setting but with a delay of a couple of seconds to pick up in case the 64 has failed to pick up.

So that’s it. I have described how I would go about calculating the earth fault current, selection of NGR value and how I would protect it.
Protection and related devices aiding protection don’t come cheap. Also I assume by your comment “this method is the most expensive option available since the cost of the transformer shall be astronomical”, you are referring to the Zig-Zag transformer and not the actual 132/33kV Star-Delta power transformer, under question.

I have taken a very generic example and tried to focus on how to arrive at a suitable value of an NGR, assuming an Star HV and Delta LV. My aim being to calculate how I could limit the fault current on the Delta LV. Being a Delta winding, I have to use a Zig-Zag transformer, for providing a low zero sequence path for the flow of earth fault current. It is really the Zig-Zag trafo. that bumps up the cost.

Note: If the above transformer is one of a kind, i.e. this is the only transformer in an isolated network, then I simply disregard the Zig-Zag transformer + NGR method and use the 3 PT broken delta method for 3Vo detection to drive a 59N. My cost here would be very low.

If the transformer is a Star-Star type with HV start solidly grounded, and LV star impedance (NGR) grounded, then I don’t need a Zig-Zag trafo. on the LV side. My cost is purely for the NGR alone.(Of course this transformer will have a Delta tertiary which may need it’s own protection depending on the whether one plans to load the tertiary or not. We could di

AQ: Difference between PLC and DDC system

PLC is defined as Programmable Logic Controller. It is a hardware, Includes processor, I/P & O/P Modules, Counters, Function Blocks, Timers,,, etc. The I/Os are either Analogue or Digitals or both. PLC can be configured to suit the application and to programmed in a logic manner by using one of the programing language such as Statement List, Ladder Diagram,, etc Interaction in real time between inputs and the resultant of the outputs through the program logic – PID – gives the entire Control System. While the Digital Control System I believe it is Software/ System that uses only Digital Signals for control and PLC/PC/Server/Central Unit may constitutes an Integral part of this system.

AQ: Power Transformer power losses

Power losses of ferromagnetic core depend from voltage and frequency. In case where is no-load secondary winding, power transformer has a power losses in primary winding (active and reactive power losses) which are very small, due to low current of primary winding (less than 1% of rated current) and power losses of ferromagnetic core (active and reactive power losses) which are the highest in case of rated voltage between ends of primary winding…

Of course, we can give voltage between the ends of primary winding of power transformer (voltage who is higher from rated voltage), but we need include some limits before that:

1. if we increase voltage in the primary winding of power transformer (voltage who is higher from rated voltage), we need to set down frequency, otherwise ferromagnetic core of power transformer will come in area of saturation, where are losses to high, which has a consequence warming of ferromagnetic core of power transformer and finally, has a consequence own damage,

2. if we increase voltage in the primary winding of power transformer (voltage who is higher from rated voltage), also intensity of magnetic field and magnetic induction will rise until “knee point voltage”: after that point, we can’t anymore increase magnetic induction, because ferromagnetic core is in area of saturation…

In that case, current of primary winding of power transformer is just limited by impedance of primary winding… By other side, in aspect of magnetising current, active component of this current is limited by resistance of ferromagnetic core, while is reactive component of this current limited by reactance of ferromagnetic core.

There is a finite amount of energy or power that can be handled by various ferromagnetic materials used for core material. Current increases greatly with relatively small voltage increases when you are over the knee of the magnetization curve characterized by the hysteresis loop. Nickel/steel mix materials saturate at lower flux densities than silicon steel materials. 50ni/50fe materials saturate at about 12kG; 80Ni/20Fe as low as 6kG. Vanadium Permendur material saturates at levels as high as 22kGauss- Nano-crystallines- 12.5kG (type), Ferrites -typically over 4kG at room, decreasing as temperature rises. What causes saturation?: Exceeding material limits.

AQ: What is ANSYS software?

This is a finite element analysis tool for various applications.
In power we get the voltage (stress) distribution in equipment like cables, bends in cables etc including stator winding of generators.

Once you go deep into it the applications become more apparent. In mechanical engineering using FEM you can identify the stresses in each member of the structure and so on.

I believe ANSYS, Abacus, Nashtran etcare extensively used for detailed analysis of stresses including electrical stresses. Some of the above offer introductory courses on line.
One needs extensive and considerable insight into partial differential equations and advanced mathematics.

AQ: Transmission line low voltages and overload situations

Q: I want to know just what the surge impedance loading (SIL) is but its relevance towards the improvement of stability and reliability of a power network especially an already existing one with various degrees of low voltages and overload situations?

A: The surge impedance loading will provide you with an easy way of determining if your transmission line is operated as a net reactor (above SIL, so external sources of (2) line-voltage-drop limitation
(3) steady-state-stability limitation

In contrast with the line voltage drop limitation, the steady state stability limitation has been discussed quite extensively in the technical literature.

However, one important point is rarely made or given proper emphasis; that is, the stability limitation should take the complete system into account, not just the line alone. This has been a common oversight which, for the lower voltage lines generally considered in the past, has not led to significant misinterpretations concerning line loadability

At higher voltage classes such as 765 kV and above, the typical levels of equivalent system reactance at the sending and receiving end of a line become a significant factor which cannot be ignored in determining line loadability as limited by stability considerations, so surge impedance loading plays a fundamental role in reliability and stability.

AQ: Transformer Saturation

AQ: Flashover in busbars

As for XLPE cable testing, if XLPE is used for insulation in the switchgear, the cross linking will be treed by HV DC and permanently destroyed. For this reason, HV DC is no longer used for XLPE cable testing. The switchgear should have a power frequency withstand test only and not HV DC. Refer to the relevant switchgear standard for the applied rms voltage. Any XLPE insulation will need to be replaced as it is most likely has been damaged by treeing of the cross linkages in the insulation. A maximum of say 2.5 kV DC is allowed for IR and PI only.

Humidity plays important part in flashover. We faced a problem of flashovers in Air insulated 11kV Switchgear busbar compartments in rainy seasons. Any sharp edge will ionize the surrounding air, which becomes conductive to high voltage discharge. Moisture will hasten the process of discharge. During HV test also this aspect should be kept in mind.

And make sure the following:
Clean all the supporting bus insulators and spouts with CRC spray.
Ensure the earth bus continuity and its connection with the earth grid.
all PTs are taken out.
all CT ckt output shorted at the panel.
All LAs are disconnected
Conduct a general cleaning of busbars through CRC-sprays.
Megger the bus bar with 5KV between phases, and between phase to earth for 1 mints before HV test.
Ensure the earth bus continuity and its connection with the earth grid.
Use AC high voltage test preferably
Connect HV test kit body ground to the SWGR body ground.
Apply 80% of the power frequency voltage applied at the FAT test.
If you are doing with AC hv kit then this may be a larger unit and leakage current is exceeding and tripping.
Try for smaller sections of busbars/increase the leakage current if options are available.
Rate of rise of voltage should be in steps of 2KV/s and gradual.
Check tripping function of the test kit.
Apply voltage betweenL1-(L2+L3)=G-1mints
apply voltage in the same way between other phases also.
If it withstands ok alternately you have to go for individual inspection of the insulators/spouts.

AQ: What is the surge impedance load

The surge impedance loading (SIL) of a line is the power load at which the net reactive power is zero. So, if your transmission line wants to “absorb” reactive power, the SIL is the amount of reactive power you would have to produce to balance it out to zero. You can calculate it by dividing the square of the line-to-line voltage by the line’s characteristic impedance.

Transmission lines can be considered as, a small inductance in series and a small capacitance to earth, – a very large number of this combinations, in series. Whatever voltage drop occurs due to inductance gets compensated by capacitance. If this compensation is exact, you have surge impedance loading and no voltage drop occurs for an infinite length or, a finite length terminated by impedance of this value (SIL load). (Loss-less line assumed!). Impedance of this line can be proved to be sqrt (L/C). If capacitive compensation is more than required, which may happen on an unloaded EHV line, then you have voltage rise at the other end, the ferranti effect. Although given in many books, it continues to remain an interesting discussion always.

The capacitive reactive power associated with a transmission line increases directly as the square of the voltage and is proportional to line capacitance and length.

Capacitance has two effects:

1 Ferranti effect
2 rise in the voltage resulting from capacitive current of the line flowing through the source impedances at the terminations of the line.

SIL is Surge Impedance Loading and is calculated as (KV x KV) / Zs their units are megawatts.

Where Zs is the surge impedance….be aware…one thing is the surge impedance and other very different is the surge impedance loading.